Navy Career Planning

Navy Career Planning: This area deals with the choices that our sailors have to make about their Naval career and what happens after.

Around the world around the clock, in defense of all we hold dear, back home...

Load Previous Comments
  • katie99

    God lift us up where we belong !!!! Amen and GO Navy....
  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    New Guidance Can Help Sailors for 'Perform to Serve'

    Story Number: NNS100414-04 Release Date: 4/14/2010 3:31:00 PM 0

    By Chief Mass Communication Specialist (SW) Maria Yager, Navy Personnel Command Public Affairs

    MILLINGTON, Tenn. (NNS) -- A Navy message released April 12 announced policy, timeline, and procedural changes to the Perform to Serve program.

    "At a time when retention is at an all-time high and attrition is at an all-time low, we have to make sure we keep the right number of people while maintaining a quality level that enables us to sustain a work force for the future," said Fleet Master Chief (AW/SW/SCW) Scott Benning, Navy Total Force/Manpower, Education and Training Fleet Master Chief. "PTS continues to evolve to ensure performance based opportunity is maintained for our best and brightest Sailors."

    NAVADMIN 128/10 provides the timeline when PTS applications should be submitted, eliminates the Page 13 "commitment of intent to reenlist" entry, addresses Navy Reserve affiliation options, and explains exceptions to PTS for limited groups of Sailors.

    Working with their chain of command, Sailors should consult their career counselor and submit a PTS application no later than 13 months before their end of active obligated service (EAOS) or projected rotation date (PRD) if service obligation will be required.

    Commands may submit applications 15 months prior to EAOS/PRD if they will be deployed during the regular processing months, or for Sailors who require early approval for special programs or decommissioning.

    Applications are required for Sailors in paygrades E-3 to E-6 with less than 14 years of service, regardless of reenlistment intentions. According to the NAVADMIN, commands may submit applications for ineligible Sailors by selecting "no" to question one, "Is member eligible for reenlistment?" This enables accountability of all Sailors, according to the message.

    The new message eliminates the requirement for Sailors to sign a Page 13 stating their reenlistment intentions. However, commands are required to submit a Page 13 to BUPERS 320 when a Sailor with PTS approval no longer desires to reenlist.

    "All members of the command leadership team should read NAVADMIN 128/10 in its entirety and remain fully engaged in the conduct of timely career development boards, counseling and mentoring," said Benning.

    PTS was first launched in 2003 as a method for the Navy to shape manning to match mission requirements. It is a centralized reservation system used to manage reenlistments. While most Sailors are permitted to reenlist in their current rate, Sailors in overmanned ratings may be offered reenlistment in an undermanned rating.

    When PTS began, it applied only to "first-term" Sailors in overmanned ratings but has grown. Last year, the Navy expanded PTS to Sailors E-3 through E-6 with six-to-10 years of service (Zone B), and then to Sailors E-3 through E-6 with 10-to-14 years of service (Zone C). Performance is a critical factor in PTS selection. Sailors in paygrades E-1 and E-2 cannot apply to reenlist.

    Commanding officers must ensure PTS applications are screened and certified for accuracy in accordance with MILPERSMAN article 1440-060 and notify BUPERS 320 of any action that may adversely affect PTS eligibility. Actions may include loss of a security clearance, three Physical Fitness Assessment failures in a four-year period, reduction in rate, submarine disqualification, elected separation, non-judicial punishment, refusal to obligate service for orders, and high-year tenure.

    More guidance is available in NAVADMIN 128/10.

    For more news from Navy Personnel Command, visit www.navy.mil/local/npc/.
  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    Missing PRIMS Data Can Slow Your Promotion

    Story Number: NNS100407-09 Release Date: 4/7/2010 3:37:00 PM 0

    By Chief Mass Communication Specialist (SW) Maria Yager, Navy Personnel Command Public Affairs

    MILLINGTON, Tenn. (NNS) -- Navy officials reminded Sailors April 7 to include a review of their physical fitness assessment data in their selection board preparations.

    "When the promotion list comes out, we scrub those names against PRIMS (Physical Readiness Information Management System). The vast majority of candidates have no problems," said Capt. Leo Falardeau, assistant commander, Navy Personnel Command (NPC) for career progression, referring to the Navy policy that requires Sailors to meet physical readiness standards in order to be promoted.

    "As long as members have taken their PRT and passed it then the promotion process can continue," said Falardeau. "If it is anything other than that -- PRIMS is blank, the member is over body fat or failed the PRT -- then we have a discrepancy."

    Last year, the Chief of Naval Personnel announced in NAVADMIN 073/09 that PRIMS data would be reviewed as part of the promotion and advancement process beginning with fiscal year 2010 boards. Falardeau's team reviews post-selection board results against the PRIMS database for all officers slated for promotion. As result a small number of promotions have been delayed in cases where a discrepancy has been found.

    "In most cases, their PRIMS data is blank and just needs to be updated. The discrepancy can be resolved fairly quickly," said Falardeau. "In other cases the member must pass the PFA or if the error is in the fitness report, the fitness report must be corrected before the Sailor may be promoted. In cases where the data cannot be immediately fixed the promotion is delayed."

    "We send a formal letter informing the member that they are delayed," said Falardeau. "And the small numbers that have been withheld have been trending downward, which we attribute to the word getting out."

    To date, this process has only applied to officers, but the FY-11 E8/E9 Selection Boards for Navy Reserve personnel, which convened March 1, will be the first enlisted selection boards to undergo the same PRIMS review.

    While command fitness leaders (CFL) are responsible for inputting PRIMS data after each cycle, Sailors are ultimately responsible for reviewing the information.

    "It is very important that Sailors review their PRIMS account for accuracy," said Bill Moore, director for the Navy's Physical Readiness Program.

    If a Sailor finds an error in PRIMS, the first step should be to contact their CFL. The command that input the data is responsible for correcting the record.

    "The first course of recommended action is for that command to send the PRIMS program manager a correction request along with supporting documentation. If the command can't assist with the records correction, then the member can always submit to the Board for Corrections of Naval Records," said Moore.

    Sailors can review their PRIMS data through BUPERS Online at https://www.bol.navy.mil.

    For more news from Navy Personnel Command, visit www.navy.mil/local/npc/.
  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    from Navy Times:

    New rules on warfare quals

    Failure to earn pin could end your career

    By Mark D. Faram

    mfaram@militarytimes.com
    Instructions laying out mandato­ry warfare qualifications will hit the fleet July 1, in which all first­term sailors must get a warfare pin during their first sea tours or doom their Navy careers.

    With the deadline near, most of the 12 warfare qualification pro­grams have been reworked to fit smoothly into a junior sailor’s assignment pipeline.

    “We’re still focused on a July 1 rollout date, and the indications are that everything will be done for that to happen,” said Fleet Master Chief (SW/AW) Tom Howard, the top sailor at Fleet Forces Command. Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy (SS/SW) Rick West tasked Howard last July with carrying out the manda­tory qualifications program.

    Under the new program, all first-term sailors on their first sea tour must complete a warfare qualification within 30 months of reporting. Failure to get pinned on time will, in most cases, result in career-ending evaluations.

    Since 1998, all E-5s and above on sea duty without a warfare qual have been required to com­plete a qualification within 18 months of beginning that tour —

    or face advancement restrictions. This requirement will remain, Howard said, for those who do their first tours ashore.

    “It’s a standard we feel every sailor should achieve,” West said. “When I see a warfare pin on a sailor’s chest, I know that sailor has a level of knowledge to where he’s able to take care of his ship, his shipmates and himself at all times — having everyone at or working toward that level will only strengthen the war-fighting ability of that command and the Navy.” Howard said sailors who are already in the fleet will also be subject to the new rule. Beginning July 1, the 30-month clock starts ticking for them as well.

    How it will work

    Under the new program, when a sailor gets to his first command, all the standards needed to get a qual will be laid out.

    Next, he will sign an entry in his service jacket stating he knows the requirements of the qual and con­sequences of failure. Sailors will be required to get only one pin during their career. Multiple quals are optional and encouraged.

    All quals must be completed in 30 months or less, although dead­lines for individual warfare pro­grams may be set earlier. Surface and aviation quals will be 30 months. The new Information Dominance Corps program will allow its members 24 months to finish. Deadlines for the other quals have not yet been released.

    “We know that many sailors complete these programs today in way less than 30 months,” Howard said. “But some ratings will need more time because of longer and more intense shipboard and in­rate quals, so setting the qualifica­tion at 30 months, we believe, makes it fair for everyone.” Both the Enlisted Surface War­fare Specialist and Enlisted Avia­tion Warfare Specialist programs — the two most common warfare quals in the Navy — will incorpo­rate a phased approach. Sailors will not be merely issued a big book to study. Rather, the program will be broken into phases with deadlines for each.

    “We don’t want to overwhelm any sailor, so this will be mapped out in a format that shows the sailor week by week what they’ll be responsible for completing,” said Force Master Chief (AW/SW) James Delozier, senior sailor at Naval Air Forces, who is oversee­ing the rework of the AW program.

    Get pinned or get out

    In the submarine force, where the qualification has been manda­tory for 86 years, sailors who fail to get their dolphins within 12 months must leave the submarine community.

    So, too, will sailors in the new warfare programs face conse­quences for missing the deadline.

    It’s up to commands to hash out specifics, but if a sailor does fall behind, the command will counsel him and develop a plan to get him caught up.

    If the remedial efforts fail, each warfare program will have specific consequences, said Force Master Chief (SW/AW) James Williams, top sailor at Naval Surface Force Atlantic.

    “First, we recommend that a command take that sailor aside and really determine why that individual didn’t complete the pro­gram and if there’s extenuating circumstances,” he said.

    That sailor will receive low marks in his next evaluation, will not be recommended for advancement and won’t be eligible to take the next advancement exam, he said.

    Those consequences doom his chance of getting approved for re­enlistment, which is weighted heavily toward paygrade and eval­uations. After a re-enlistment rejection, it’s only a matter of time before he has to leave the Navy.

    The mandatory qual program doesn’t just affect sailors with nothing on their chests. Deck­plate leaders are in charge of mak­ing it happen.

    “You should know on the drop of a dime who in your work center, divi­sion or whole command is qualified. Who is making progress and who needs more work. We haven’t done a very good job of that in the past, and that has to change for this to be successful,” Williams said.

    Most work centers have a train­ing petty officer who must track sailors’ progress. But it doesn’t end there, Williams said. All leaders —

    the leading petty officer, depart­mental chiefs and the command master chief — must ensure sailors are on track. If they don’t, this will show up in their evaluations, too.

    Reworking programs

    The surface program, Williams said, will continue to run in two parts: a core curriculum for everyone and a ship-specific cur­riculum based on the sailor’s assignment.

    “We’ve already rewritten the core, and now we’re at work on the ship-specific,” Williams said. “We’ve already found out in some cases we were asking sailors to learn about equipment that was no longer on our ships.” The SW program will undergo annual reviews for relevance.

    The AW program isn’t as far along. Right now it’s similar to the SW program, with a core followed by a platform-specific focus.

    Delozier said they plan to drop the common core part and develop totally new, platform-specific ver­sions for each of the 23 separate ship and aircraft programs.

    All that, he said, is being decided by a team of command master chiefs and aviation maintenance master chiefs. They all agree on one thing: The content must be tougher.

    “We have decided the program needs to be more detailed and have more in-depth knowledge requirements,” Delozier said.

    Both programs aren’t expected to be finished until sometime in 2011, so for the time being, they’ll continue to use their existing pro­grams and gradually roll out the parts as they become available.

    Updating the programs once they have been instituted will be easier now. Content changes will rest with the type commander, rather than the warfare sponsor in the Pentagon.

    Howard, Delozier and Williams agree that the biggest challenge to getting mandatory warfare quali­fications off the ground will be get­ting everyone in the fleet used to a new way of doing business.

    “The challenge for us is to be mindful of the culture change and not try to take this too far, too soon,” Williams said. □
  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    from Navy Times:

    Chiefs face the ax
    More sailors at risk in forced­retirement board

    By Mark D. Faram

    mfaram@militarytimes.com

    As many as 9,000 active-duty and reserve chiefs, senior chiefs and master chiefs will go before a forced retirement board on Sept. 20 — 3,000 more than the number considered last year when the board first met.

    This year, senior sailors in the diver, special warfare and explo­sive ordnance disposal fields are no longer exempt, which has dri­ven up the number of eligibles, although sailors in the nuclear and command master chief rat­ings are still exempt, as are some others. Personnel officials have also expanded that pool to include sailors with 19 years of service, as opposed to 20 years and up. Sailors must still have three years in their paygrade. No one will be forced to quit before becom­ing retire­ment-eligible.

    In addition, this year’s board will examine the records of 2,000 senior drilling reservists. Reserve eligibility rules are similar to the active compo­nent, except there are no exempt ratings or communities, and time in service is calculated differently.

    The announcement came May 19 in a fleetwide message, NavAdmin 180/10.

    “The continuation board has expanded from last year,” said Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy (SS/SW) Rick West. “This is a move in the right direction so we are retaining the best people pos­sible for our Navy.” West said the goal of the board continues to be identifying nonperforming chiefs and those with misconduct on their records.

    “This is a performance-based board, and I have confidence that the senior enlisted leadership who sit on the board are focused on fairness and proper adherence to standards and are choosing who they want to stand with and lead the Navy,” he said.

    Last year’s board, which was the first of its kind in 15 years, ended up forcing 158 chiefs to retire.

    Who gets a look

    All E-7 through E-9 active-duty and full-time support sailors not in an exempt category who will have at least 19 years of service and three years’ time in rate as of Sept. 1 will be seen by the board.

    For Selected Reserve sailors, the 19 years of total service are com­puted from their pay entry base date as of Sept. 1. The three years’ time in grade also applies.

    “In developing lessons learned from last year’s board, we realized that with the time given for these chiefs to retire, we could drop the time in service to 19 years,” said Capt. Leo Falardeau, head of career progression at Navy Person­nel Command. “By the time it’s all said and done, they’ll still be able to retire with their 20 years.” This year, fewer sailors will be excluded. Although those with nuclear power specialties and command master chiefs will con­tinue to be exempt, Navy divers, special warfare operators, special warfare boat operators and explo­sive ordnance disposal technicians will get a look.

    But the addition of reservists, both full-time support and drilling reservists, is a significant change, Falardeau said. Force Master Chief Ronney Wright (FMF), top sailor in Navy Reserve Forces Command, said the board will examine both selected reservists and those in voluntary training units — Individual Ready Reserve sailors not in a paid billet, but who drill for points only.

    Falardeau said the board will be fully integrated and “reflect the Navy as a whole,” which means all of the board’s panels will include reserve and full-time support sailors.

    “We intend to fully brief the reserves about the active force career paths, and we’ll do the same for active board members,” Falardeau said. “There will be no doubt what the standards are and all will be held to the same ruler.”

    How it will work

    Like last year’s board, this year’s selection has no quotas, in what leaders call a “quality cut.” Commands are encouraged to review their chiefs’ records and determine who’s eligible for a look this year, and ensure all records are complete. Packages will be considered and are due at NPC in Millington, Tenn., by Aug. 16.

    Those deemed unfit to continue must retire by June 30, 2011.

    Some reservists will need to leave their drilling status before accruing 20 years toward retire­ment, because reservists must accrue a minimum number of drill points per year of service for that year to count toward retirement. But at the same time, their time in service and time in grade clock keeps ticking regardless of whether they are on active status. Chiefs forced from drilling reserve status before having enough quali­fying years for their reserve retire­ment will be allowed to finish their careers in the IRR. But instead of drilling, they must complete Navy correspondence courses to obtain those retirement points.

    To get a qualifying year toward retirement, all reservists must earn at least 50 retirement points. Most drilling reservists earn two retirement points for each drill day, while active-duty days count for one. □
  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    waiting for results:

    This is from Navy Times.....looks like MANY will not advance....

    Active petty officer quotas at historic lows

    By Mark D. Faram - Staff writer
    Posted : Wednesday May 26, 2010 16:55:52 EDT

    The names of the Navy’s newest active-duty petty officers first, second and third class are expected to be released as early as Thursday, but there will be fewer sailors crowing about their new crows

    That’s because the Navy has quotas to advance fewer than 15,000 to E-4, E-5 and E-6.

    Navy-wide, there is a 16.42 percent chance to advance, with 88,715 sailors passing their tests and 14,570 quotas available to move up. That is down from 19.86 percent last fall and a 24.08 percent chance just a year ago.

    Part of the problem is more competition, with 1,758 more sailors passing their tests than the 86,957 who passed in September, and 2,740 more than a year ago, when 85,975 became eligible to advance by passing advancement exams.

    But the real killer is fewer quotas, down 2,808 from the 17,378 available slots to move up last fall. That’s also 6,087 fewer than last year’s spring cycle, when 20,657 got a new chevron.

    The falloff was worst at the E-4 level, where opportunity is the lowest since at least 1997. The 5,760 available quotas are 1,602 fewer than the 7,362 made available last fall. Quotas for third class are also down 4,474 from the spring 2009 cycle’s 10,234 quotas.

    At 24.40 percent opportunity, it’s lowest chance to make E-4 in nearly two decades. Opportunity has dropped nearly 10 percentage points each year since spring 2008, when it was 46.58 percent.

    At the E-5 level, opportunity is also down for the third cycle in a row. The overall opportunity to make second class dipped to 15.52 percent, down from the 18.97 percent last fall and 22.6 percent just a year ago.

    It’s the lowest chance at making E-5 since fall 1997, when opportunity was 15.06 percent, but still a bit above the 12.57 percent in the fall of 1996, when the Navy was drawing down.

    Here, too, competition is rising. Since the spring 2009 cycle, the numbers of test-passers has increased by 1,011 while quotas dropped by 2,109, causing the slide in opportunity.

    If there’s a bright spot, it’s at E-6, where opportunity dipped a fraction of a percentage point to 11.08, down from 11.09 last fall. That’s still higher than last spring’s 10.75 percent.

    Although the quotas dropped from last fall by 130, to 3,233, it’s still higher than the 2,787 quotas available last spring. But the drop in quotas was offset by fewer eligible sailors — 1,31l fewer test passers than last fall.

    Visit navytimes.com for updates on when the advancement lists will be released.

    Full-time support down, too
    The news is just as bad in the full-time support ranks, though they outpaced the regular Navy’s opportunity at E-4 and E-5.

    Overall, 444 FTS sailors will advance out of 2,648 test passers for an overall opportunity of 16.77 percent. That’s 69 fewer quotas than last fall, when opportunity was 19.01 percent with 513 advancing out of 2,689 test passers.

    At E-4, opportunity dropped to 35.81 percent with 140 quotas, 12 fewer than the 152 who moved up in the fall when opportunity was 40.43 percent.

    For those seeking to advance to E-5, opportunity dropped to 16.33 percent, down from 19.48 last cycle. Quotas dropped by 26, allowing 155 of 949 eligible sailors to sew on a second chevron.

    For E-6 hopefuls, there are 31 fewer quotas. Opportunity is 11.39 percent, down from 13.01 last fall, dropping FTS E-6 opportunity slightly below that of the regular active component.


    CLICK FOR ACTIVE ADVANCEMENT QUOTAS
  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    great news from the DOD....this was sent to me by one of our great members!!

    My Career Advancement Account (MyCAA)
    Questions and Answers

    Q1. When will MyCAA be reinstated?

    A1. Monday, October 25, at 8 a.m. (EDT).

    Q2. Why was October 25 chosen to reinstate the program for all military spouses?

    A2. This date was chosen to allow enough time to implement the new staffing and software infrastructure.

    Q3. Why did it take so long to make this decision?

    A3. We wanted to make sure we got it right, especially in view of fiscal realities the federal government is facing.

    Q4. How has the program changed?

    A4. Eligible spouses will receive DoD-funded assistance of $4,000 for three years from the start date of the first class. Key program changes include:

    • Financial assistance will cover tuition for associate's degrees, licensure, and certification programs. Consultants will assist spouses in identifying other funding resources for higher academic degrees.

    • Annual cap of $2,000 per spouse, per fiscal year. A spouse pursuing licensures or certifications requiring an up-front fee greater than $2,000 may apply for a waiver of the annual cap up to the total maximum assistance of $4,000.

    • Finally, there will be clarification and stricter enforcement of active duty eligibility. In the past, there was a window around Guard and Reserve deployments during which their spouses could sign up for the program. Effective immediately, only those spouses whose service members are executing Title 10 orders will be eligible. This includes spouses of deployed National Guard and Reserve members with a completed active duty military ID, who are activated on Title 10 orders. This change in practice is to better comply with the program's authorizing legislation. All spouse participants must be able to start and complete their courses while their military sponsor is on
    Title 10 orders.

    Q5. Why weren’t these program guidelines incorporated into the program before?

    A5. We recognize that this was a shortfall and have taken corrective action.

    Q6. How can we assure the vitality of the program?

    A6. Current and anticipated financial constraints are the primary reason for restricting the program to junior pay grades.

    • We will focus our efforts on a more robust and customer-centric counseling approach, monitor usage closely, and use better defined guidelines.

    • We have increased the staffing levels to handle the anticipated call volume which will include more one-on-one counseling with spouses. The one-on-one counseling will allow spouses to make better education, training and career choices in a field of study that not only best fits her or his interests, but is also relevant to current market employment conditions.

    • The new approach will also require counselors and participants to look beyond the MyCAA funding resources to optimize military spouses' access to and use of available resources. Military spouses will be guided along a more holistic approach to career planning, to include finding additional federal benefits available to them.

    Q7. How can you assure that this program will not incur the same problems as it did in February?

    A7. We believe the new constraints will keep costs in check. We have also reviewed the entire MyCAA program and have instituted additional controls and forecasting tools to better anticipate future demand. We will now monitor program utilization more frequently (daily) with our additional metrics. These include number of spouses creating financial assistance documents, funds obligated, number and type of career field (that is, certificate or degree). Before the pause, we monitored the program on a daily, weekly and monthly basis.

    Q8. What is the new budget for the MyCAA program?

    A8. We have reprogrammed funds to meet the needs of the program for fiscal year 2010; estimated at $215M.

    Q9. What is the budget for the out years and how do you plan to fund it?

    A9. The estimated cost for FY 2011 is $250M; we anticipate lower costs in the out years. This is still a very new program and consequently, we lack sufficient long-term experience and historical data to formulate a refined budget estimate. We will be monitoring the program closely in FY2011.

    Q10. Considering Secretary Gates’ guidance to reduce DoD’s budget, how can the department justify spending this amount of money on military spouses? How does this impact the war effort?

    A10. A reduced budget in coming years is a reality, and every DoD program will be closely scrutinized in coming years for its contribution to military family readiness. Whatever the choices ahead, maintaining our incredible all-volunteer force is our highest priority as we strive to recruit, attract, and retain America’s sons and daughters in the service of our nation. Families play a crucial role in supporting servicemembers on the battlefield.

    Q11. Where will the funding come from?

    A11. DoD has been able to reprogram money to meet immediate program needs.

    Q12. Will the budget be cut?

    A12. Not in FY 2011. However, in coming years, with a reduced defense budget a reality, every program will be closely scrutinized for its contribution to military family readiness.

    Q13. How would you handle another spike?

    A13. We will use the historical information with current usage data to ensure we can meet the demand. We are monitoring program utilization on a daily basis. This monitoring helps us assess how well we are able to serve military spouses interested in the program as well as the funding stream ‘burn rate.’ If usage surpasses the budget, DoD will reprogram to meet the requirement.
    Q14. Were other options considered?

    A14. Yes. We considered a wide range of options, examining multiple variations in every aspect: paygrade, program covered, and time offered. We believe the selected option assists the spouses who need it most and allows them the flexibility they need to get started in a broad range of careers. It also allows us to be good stewards of taxpayer's dollars, and increases the effectiveness and efficiency in managing the program.

    Q15. What drove the decision to include the program guidelines; that is, the annual cap?

    A15. We have to face present and future fiscal realities – so we adjusted the program to assist those spouses who need it most.

    Q16. Why weren’t these program guidelines incorporated into the program before?

    A16. We recognize that this was a shortfall and have taken corrective action.

    Q17. How many military spouses are currently enrolled in the program?

    A17. More than 136,000 (the exact number is 136,583) military spouses have accounts in the program; approximately 110,000 spouses have been approved for financial assistance.

    Q18. Have spouses failed courses? How much has DoD lost as a result of failed courses? What was the course of action then? What is the course of action now?

    A18. Yes. As a result of the course failures and withdrawals, the Defense Department will not realize any benefit from approximately $6.6M in funds that were spent on these failures. Previously, spouses were not held accountable for failing grades or withdrawing from classes. Under the new guidelines, spouses will have to show successful completion of a course in order to continue in the program. The intent is to further strengthen accountability and commitment. For spouses who have ‘good cause’ for failure or withdrawal from a course, procedures for hardship waivers, similar to that of voluntary education programs for servicemembers, will be in place.

    Q19. Will all spouses not enrolled be able to take advantage of the GI Bill? If not, what benefits are available to them?

    A19. The GI Bill Transfer Benefit is open to those service members with at least 6 years' service who commit to at least another four. It is at each service member's discretion whether some or all of this benefit is transferred to his or her spouse and/or children. As some of the GI Bill program nuances are complex, we encourage all spouses to visit the program website at: www.gibill.va.gov.

    Q20. How long may spouses participate in the program?

    A20. Military spouse may participate in the program for three years from the start date of their first course funded by MyCAA; all classes must be started and completed while the spouse’s service member is on active duty.

    Q21. What will happen to spouses currently in the program? Will they be ‘’grandfathered in”?

    A21. Spouses currently in the program, within the eligible pay grades, may participate under the new guidelines. All other spouses remain eligible for career and education counseling services, but not financial assistance from DoD.

    Q22. What would you say to military spouses who may feel left out of the program or are angry about not being able to participate in the program?

    A22. We regret the impact that these changes will have on those spouses who will no longer be eligible. We carefully weighed that impact in our decision, but we had to make the program fiscally sustainable. All spouses will have access to the enhanced career counseling element of the program. This will include advice on finding alternate sources of financial assistance.

    Q23. What about spouses who want to enroll in the Fall Semester of 2010?

    A23. We regret that some spouses may not be able to enroll in those schools that adhere to a traditional Fall Semester start date. However, many institutions offer a rolling registration, both in online and classroom settings, and some offer waivers. We encourage spouses to work with MyCAA counselors, as well as their educational institutions’ counseling and admissions staff, to work through the complexities of these issues.

    Q24. What other programs are available for military spouses?

    A24. There are a wide variety of federal, state, local, and Service programs for military spouses. To assist military spouses in their search for resources and programs, Military OneSource has developed an in-depth list of federal, scholarship and grant providers. The list provides an overview financial assistance available for education with program contact information. Some of these resources include:

    • Tuition Assistance Tax Credit (“American opportunity credit”). This new education tax credit, a modification of the Hope credit, is available for 2010. The maximum credit per student is $2,500 (100 percent of the first $2,000 and 25 percent of the next $2,000 of qualified education expenses).

    • Pell Grants; considered a foundation of federal financial aid, to which aid from other federal and nonfederal sources might be added. These grants are awarded usually only to undergraduate students who have not earned a bachelor's or a professional degree.

    • Department of Education Web site, www.studentaid.ed.gov, includes an extensive listing of resources

    Q25. Why do you have this program? Isn’t this something the Department of Education or the Department of Labor should be doing?

    A25. The military lifestyle is unique and we developed the program to be responsive to those unique needs. Military service extracts a heavy demand on military families. The key employment challenge facing military spouses is the frequent permanent change of duty station moves, which entail adverse consequences, most notably lengthy interruption in employment and profession education, the loss of job tenure needed to build seniority and retirement benefits, and the need to meet location-specific licensing and certification requirements. Military spouses often find themselves responsible for balancing work and family life as a single parent, while simultaneously trying to achieve personal goals. Military spouses are the backbone of military families, displaying strength of character to be admired by this nation. We continue to collaborate with the Department of Education and Department of Labor on behalf of our military spouses.

    Q26. Will there be other agencies helping to fund this program; for example, DEA, DOL, DHS, etc.?

    A26. No, not directly. The program will be funded by the Defense Department; however, our career counselors will work with other federal agencies to maximize the use of federal education and training resources.

    Q27. Where can military spouses go for advice and counseling?

    A27. Military OneSource, toll-free at (800) 342-9647 and online at www.militaryonesource.com is the best place for military spouses to start getting information. Military OneSource Spouse Education and Career Consultants can provide education and training, career exploration, assessment, employment readiness and career search assistance.

    Additional Questions (added):

    Q28. Didn’t Secretary Gates promise a bigger program with a $500 million budget when he spoke at Fort Riley a few weeks ago?

    A28.

    Some of you heard what our senior leadership, including me, said about this program in the past—to include some pretty generous budget figures.

    Some of those numbers were too large: the fact is, we have to face present and future fiscal realities. You’ll recall that a few weeks ago, Secretary Gates drew a line in the sand and challenged the Department to identify program savings and efficiencies.

    It’s not going to be easy, but it’s the right thing to do. So, as a part of that, we adjusted the MyCAA program to assist those spouses who need it most.

    Q29. Why an annual cap? Why waivers for licensures / certifications?

    A29. The $2,000 annual cap is necessary to keep the annual costs of the budget in check. We recognize, however, that some licensures and certifications require more than that up front.

    Q30. Why the reduction in the total maximum benefit from $6,000 to $4,000? Associates’ Degrees cost a lot more than that or why aren’t you funding Bachelor’s or Advanced Degrees? Some of the “licensures and certifications” that you’re claiming to “support” require Bachelor’s or higher as prerequisites?

    A30. Those are true statements—we won’t cover the total cost even of an Associates’ Degree, and some spouses will need to go well beyond that to reach their career goals.

    However, this program is to give spouses a start—not take them all the way to the completion of their degree programs.
    • Tuition for Associates’ Degrees are averaging between $6,800 and $8,000—that’s more than the original $6,000 offered before.
    • So this reduction isn’t good news, but it’s what we have to do to sustain the program, and keep us in line with our fiscal responsibilities.


    Q31. If a spouse is enrolled in a course on October 25, and is no longer eligible for the program, does that mean they won’t get their money?

    A31. Spouses are approved for financial assistance before their course begins, and payment goes to the school. All financial assistance that’s already approved will be honored, including after the program changes.
  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    Major news here about re-enlistments from Navy Times, Sept 27

    Re-up rules get tough

    PTS overhaul looks at fitness, warfare qualifications

    By Mark D. Faram

    mfaram@militarytimes.com
    New rules roll out Oct. 1 for the Perform to Serve re-enlistment approval pro­gram — and the changes could make or break your career.

    The changes are part of a com­plete overhaul of PTS that lead­ers hope will make it fairer in determining who stays and goes by giving a better picture of the “complete” sailor.

    With the new rules, Millington will be looking further back into your performance history before approving re-enlistment. The sys­tem will also look at your fitness data, number of warfare qualifica­tions and any nonjudicial punish­ment.

    The timeline for applications has been simplified to take away some of the guesswork, and officials have added new tools to help sailors “manage” their applications, which should give them an edge in know­ing their odds of approval each month.

    The PTS system began seven years ago for first-term sailors, and over the past year has been applied to sailors through their 14th year of service. Sailors up for re-enlistment are given a quota to remain in their rating, convert to a new rating where the need is greater, or are told they need to leave the Navy.

    The PTS changes come at a time of widespread misunderstanding and fear of how the system works in the fleet, deck-plate leaders said. The solution, they say, is for sailors to educate themselves and drive the process at the command. “There’s a misnomer out there that this is completely done by the computer and there’s no human interaction when it comes to the rack and stacks. That’s not true,” said Capt. Hank Roux, head com­munity manager at Navy Person­nel Command.

    In the end, Roux said, more are approved to stay than are sent home.

    As of Sept. 16, 95,575 applica­tions had been put into PTS since Oct. 1, 2009. That number includes some redundancy, as sailors can modify and resubmit their applica­tion each month.

    Of those, 46,689, or 49 percent, were approved to ship over in current rating. Another 955, or 1 percent, were approved to convert to another rating. Five percent, or 5,163, were told to separate. Another 10,978 were “rolled over” in the system and are awaiting next month’s run.

    Until now, PTS assumed you would apply 12 months before your “hard” end of active obligated service date. That’s without counting extensions that you might have agreed to. Now, the time to apply is changing to the “soft” EAOS, meaning 12 months before the end of your total obliga­tion to the Navy, including any extensions.

    “That’s really the time a sailor must make a decision, so that will now be the default,” said Joe Kelly, program manager for PTS at Millington.

    There are some situations in which a sailor can apply early. Navy rules allows sailors to cancel an extension before it kicks in if they re-enlist, which allows them to cash in on re-up bonuses or spe­cial training. This also applies to sailors whose rotation date is with­in 24 months of their soft EAOS as well, as those sailors will have to obligate more service to negotiate orders.

    For any of these “special circum­stances,” Kelly said, the sailor will need PTS approval to ship over, but it will be up to the command to inform Millington. If they fail to win approval, their extensions kick in and they can apply again later.

    Another new twist is designed to reduce the numbers of sailors who slip through the cracks. While career counselors must still track those needing PTS approval, Millington will identify every sailor who is 15 months away from his end of service date and automati­cally put an application in the sys­tem in his rating.

    “Just because we’re generating the initial application doesn’t take away from command or sailor responsibility,” Kelly said. “It will be their responsibility to verify every eligible sailor is in the system and that all their data is correct.” Personnel command will only do this for sailors approaching their soft EAOS. Those wishing to re­enlist under special circumstances such as at their hard EAOS or near their rotation date will have to be entered manually by the command career counselor.

    Every month, officials will pub­lish online the actual quotas for both in-rate re-enlistments and conversions, along with a running tally of how many applications are received for those slots.

    “This will give a realistic look at their chances,” Kelly said. “If they see there are 70 quotas in their rating and 220 sailors are apply­ing, they might want to consider applying for a conversion.” PTS — just like it has since 2003

    — starts with a formula that ranks everyone on a computer.

    Those who come out on top get this month’s re-enlistment quotas. Sailors compete with others in their rating and re-enlistment zone. Zone A covers those with up to six years of service; Zone B goes from six to 10 years, and Zone C takes it up to 14 years.

    For active-duty approvals, the process will include two separate formulas — one customized for in­rate approvals and the other for conversions. Sailors will be able to compete in both at the same time. “For example, if someone’s first choice is to re-enlist in-rate, but they’re willing to convert, they’ll first compete in the in-rate stack, and if they don’t get a quota, then they’ll compete in the conversion stack,” Kelly said.

    The reworked formula will review at least four, but up to five years of promotion recommendations in per­formance evaluations instead of the two years used in the old formula.

    Also new in the formula is fit­ness data.

    “Just like the rules on the [physical fitness assessment], we’re looking at the last four years — and we give a value of 0 through 3, with 0 meaning no failures,” Kelly said. “If you have three failures in four years, you should be gone — so we’re saying in PTS if you have three failures, the system is going to kick out your application.” When the rankings are finished, the quotas are applied. If there are 20 spots available, then the first 20 on the list get provisional approval. That approval must go through three separate reviews before a quota is official. “Where it could play is if you have 20 quotas in a rating this month and you have two guys tied at No. 20, one has an NJP and one doesn’t,” Roux said. “The one without ... will get the nod.” The same thing can play out with warfare qualifications, he said.

    “These are tough calls for [com­munity managers], because what if you have one guy who went to NJP who got back on track and he has a warfare qual, while the other guy with a clean record doesn’t have a qual but didn’t go to NJP — they must decide who is the best sailor overall.”
  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    Blue to Green Is Option for Sailors Facing Separation

    From Navy Personnel Command Public Affairs

    MILLINGTON, Tenn. (NNS) -- In a climate where Sailors may face separation due to high year tenure or Perform-to-Serve/Fleet Rating Identification Engine, Navy leadership is reminding Sailors in 2011 that Operation Blue to Green could keep them serving.

    "Sailors should be aware of all avenues to stay in the military," said Capt. Hank Roux, head enlisted community management.

    According to the Army's Operation Blue to Green website, the program allows highly qualified Sailors the opportunity to continue in military service, maintain benefits and gain new training.

    Benefits of transitioning to the Army via Blue to Green include:

    * E-1 through E-5 retain their grade and date of rank.
    * Rates that convert into an Army military occupational specialty (MOS) will only need to attend Basic Combat Training.
    * Retraining into another MOS may be possible.

    "Of course we want all of our Sailors to stay Navy, whether that is active, full time support or Reserve component, but if a Sailor's facing separation Blue to Green is a great option for them," Roux said.

    In fiscal year 2010, only 43 Sailors took advantage of the program.

    To qualify, Sailors must be physically fit, meet the Army's height and weight standards, have a minimum of three years time in service and have an approved Request for Conditional Release (DD Form 368).

    For more information, speak with your career counselor, review SECNAVINST 1000.7F, MILPERSMAN 1300-081 and the Army's Operation Blue to Green website at http://www.goarmy.com/benefits/additional-incentives/blue-to-green.....

    For more news from Navy Personnel Command, visit www.navy.mil/local/npc/.
  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    knock doors on defense contractors.......
  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    folks...sorry about some of the recent posts just getting cut off in mid-sentence.  Our provider was made aware of the issue and has resolved (hopefully....) the problem.
  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    ok....let me try this again now that my posting problem is resolved:

     

    9,000 jobs to go

    Officials aim for end strength of 319,000 by 2015



    By Mark D. Faram




    The Navy plans to cut end strength by 9,000 sailors over the next four years.

    That would ratchet the service’s end strength —
    328,271 as of Feb. 18 even lower than planned for the recent drawdown, and lower than Navy officials believe they need to carry out the service’s post-war missions.

    In fact, the plan
    included in the Navy’s 2012 budget puts the service on track to exceed the drawdown goal of 322,500 by fiscal 2013, dropping to 319,000 by the end of fiscal 2015.

    Cuts started in earnest in 2003, when the Navy, with an end strength of 382,235, put into effect a plan to whittle the force.

    Since then, more than 53,000 sailors have been shown the door.

    Navy officials were able to con­vince Congress in 2009 to pause that drawdown, saying they just couldn’t go any lower and still meet all the Navy’s regular mis­sions — as well as provide nearly 14,000 active and reserve individ­ual augmentee sailors annually to serve with the Army and Marine Corps in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    But Chief of Naval Personnel Vice Adm. Mark Ferguson told Navy Times in a Feb 17 interview that those requirements are pro­jected to begin dropping off during fiscal 2012 and continue to drop into 2013.

    Moreover, he said units assigned to Navy Expeditionary Combat Command are likely targets for cuts.

    Though Ferguson acknowledged that the projected cuts are shown in this year’s budget documents, he said future end strength is far from settled.

    “There’s some element of uncer­tainty in the out years, which is why I’m reluctant to say that’s exactly where we’re going to go,” he said.

    That’s because demand for sailors in the war zones may not
    go away, he said. Also, he noted that ship-building schedules could change, which could cause planned decommissionings to slip. Both factors could give him ammunition to keep the Navy’s end strength higher.

    But he said the biggest battle is out of his hands: The most impor­tant factor in determining the Navy’s future size will be “the fis­cal environment and what we’re going to face next year and the year after.” “I would say I’m absolutely cer­tain that 325,700 is the number for [fiscal 2012],” Ferguson said. “For [fiscal 2013], we’re in the middle of a new budget build, and a lot of these items are back on the table for discussion, because they’re kind of based on projections.” Ferguson said he and Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead both believe that the Navy needs to remain roughly 325,000 strong, even post-war, to meet slated missions and man the current fleet as well as the ships of the future.

    Ferguson said he believes fleet leaders will be able to argue against future cuts. But he also admits that their success will ultimately depend on available funds. If they are not successful, the service will need to make hard decisions.


    War-related reductions


    Ferguson said fiscal 2012 will be the first year Navy manpower won’t be inflated because of the war effort.

    “All of our funding in this budget is the baseline for the active side,” he said. “There’s no supplemental funding as we had in previous years for end strength.” And as the war in Iraq winds down, he said some of the roughly 15,000 active-duty sailors at Navy Expeditionary Combat Command face cuts.

    “There are some reductions in capacity in those areas. We will reduce some of the maritime expe­
    ditionary security squadrons, and there are some projections that we could take — not until [fiscal 2013] and out — some other NECC reductions” for units yet to be identified, he said.

    Those initial cuts to the security squadrons, officials say, will result in going from six squadrons in the active force down to just to three while maintaining seven in the reserves.

    Also, as many as three naval mobile construction battalions could go away in 2013 or beyond. There are nine active and 12 reserve battalions, each with roughly 600 sailors.

    “Right now, we’re projecting that we will take two active battalions out in [fiscal 2013] from the nine we have today,” Ferguson said “But I will tell you that’s still on the table for debate.” Navy budget officials say projections for fiscal 2013 budget call for removing three battalions from the active force, although the Navy is expected to fight to keep that loss to two.

    Yet to be decided is whether battalions go away for good, or switch to the reserve component.

    “We’re looking at, is the right answer seven active and 14 reserve or seven active and 12 reserve?” Ferguson said Additionally, the projected Marine Corps drawdown of roughly 15,000 to 20,000 people will help the Navy cut more of what Ferguson calls “blue in support of green” billets.

    “We contribute billets, such as corpsmen and chaplains and other personnel, in support of the Marine Corps,” he said. “So as Marine Corps reduces in size, those [billets] will start to reduce in the outer years.”


    Finding savings


    Since the post-Cold War draw­down began in 1990, the enlisted force has borne the brunt of man­power cuts.

    The enlisted work force has been
    cut 47.8 percent since 1989, when the service hit its post-Vietnam high, while officers were cut by 28.3 percent over the same time frame.

    The previous drawdowns, Fer­guson said, avoided cutting what he calls “overhead” — reducing the officers who were overseeing the work.

    That’s why Ferguson turned to the officer corps first, seeking to eliminate or consolidate officer­heavy staffs.

    “For example, we had a subma­rine squadron staff with four boats in it,” he said. “We’re now going to a squadron construct where they had eight or nine boats in it, as it was years ago — that’s an example of how when we took the strength out, we did not focus on the strength that was overseeing it.” From fiscal 2012 through 2014, he’ll consolidate staffs, with the goal of cutting 2,000 to 3,000 billets.

    Those savings, he said, include the consolidation of 2nd Fleet with Strike Forces Atlantic Training and Fleet Forces Command.

    Also being eliminated are a destroyer squadron staff, three sub­marine squadron staffs, an air wing staff and a carrier strike group staff. He also said he had identified 1,000 billets to be cut at Navy Installations Command, the sys­tems commands and Navy Recruiting Command.

    As a part of these staff reduc­tions, Ferguson also is looking at the structure of the officer corps,
    seeking to shrink that to bring it even more in line with the trimmer enlisted work force. He started at the top.

    “We did flag billets, we eliminat­ed nine and reduced 15 [in rank],” he said. Those 15 reductions, he said, were done by dropping some O-8 billets down to O-7 and some O-7 billets to O-6.

    Next, he reworked the billet structure of the restricted line and staff communities, such as lawyers, all types of medical offi­cers and supply. “We looked at the seniority of the billets in those offi­cer communities and we rolled some of them down,” he said.

    Ferguson didn’t say how many total billets this officer corps restructuring produced.

    Still, he said, reviews like this will continue during the next few budget cycles in an effort to find more savings.


    Recruiting untouched


    Ferguson said one thing the Navy won’t do is reduce recruiting goals. The service learned a valuable les­son in the previous drawdowns, when recruiting cuts created man­ning problems in later years.

    Ferguson said officials learned savings must come from other places.

    “Were down to [bringing in] 34,000 this fiscal year,” he said. “We’ve probably got a little room left, but we’re extremely close to the margins — we cannot cut our future by stopping accession.” □

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    Record Retention, Shifting Missions Prompt Focused Navy Retention Board

    WASHINGTON (NNS) -- The Navy announced April 14 that it will conduct a focused enlisted retention board (ERB) in August for 31 specific ratings.

    The ERB will be conducted as a result of record high retention and low attrition among active duty Sailors and to meet current and future planned end strength controls.

    Currently, the Navy is overmanned in 31 of its 84 ratings, and as a result, many ratings have limited Perform-to-Serve (PTS) quotas available, resulting in increased competition and reduced opportunity for strong performing Sailors to reenlist. In order to enable the PTS program to work as designed to shape the force, Navy leadership has determined it is necessary to increase the opportunity for top performing Sailors to compete for a quota.

    "Programs like Perform-to-Serve and selective reenlistment bonus have been effective tools at optimizing and stabilizing our force strength. Retention behavior, coupled with the shift of 6,800 billets back to sea and development of our capabilities in key areas such as ballistic missile defense (BMD), cyber and information dominance has necessitated the establishment of the enlisted retention board to meet congressionally mandated end strength and to rebalance the force," explained Chief of Naval Personnel, Vice Adm. Mark Ferguson.

    The board will review the records of selected third class petty officers (E-4) through senior chief petty officers (E-8) in the 31 overmanned ratings with greater than seven but less than 15 years of cumulative service as of Oct. 1 2011, and will be conducted in two independent phases -- Phase I will review E-4 to E-5 Sailors and will convene Aug. 22, 2011. Phase II will review E-6 to E-8 Sailors and will convene Sept. 26, 2011.

    The specific ratings identified include the following:

    - Aviation Boatswain's Mate Fuels (ABF)
    - Aviation Machinist's Mate (AD)
    - Aviation Electrician's Mate (AE)
    - Aerographer's Mate (AG)
    - Aviation Structural Mechanic (AM)
    - Aviation Support Equipment Technician (AS)
    - Aviation Electronics Technician (AT)
    - Aircrewman Mechanical (AWF)
    - Aircrew - Tactical Helicopter (AWR)
    - Aircrew – Avionics (AWV)
    - Aviation Maintenance Administrationman (AZ)
    - Builder (BU)
    - Construction Electrician (CE)
    - Construction Mechanic (CM)
    - Engineering Aide (EA)
    - Electrician's Mate Surface (EMSW)
    - Equipment Operator (EO)
    - Electronics Technician, Surface Warfare (ETSW)
    - Fire Controlman (non-Aegis) (FC)
    - Gas Turbine Systems Technician, Electrical (GSE)
    - Machinist's Mate, Surface Warfare (MMSW)
    - Mineman (MN)
    - Machinery Repairman (MR)
    - Operations Specialist (OS)
    - Parachute Rigger (PR)
    - Personnel Specialist (PS)
    - Religious Program Specialist (RP)
    - Ship's Serviceman (SH)
    - Sonar Technician Surface (STG)
    - Steelworker (SW)
    - Utilitiesman (UT)

    The board will exclude Sailors whose soft expiration of active obligated service (EAOS) date is in FY12 because they will be considered in PTS. The board will also exclude those who advanced to their current paygrade in cycles 208 (E-4/5/6), 209 (E-8/9), 210 (E-7), or 211 (E-4/5/6), are nuclear qualified, Joint Special Warfare Command enablers and those currently enrolled in the Navy's Safe Harbor program.

    This quota-based board is anticipated to review roughly 16,000 records and will identify approximately 3,000 Sailors who will not be retained on active duty. In essence, this board will review roughly 6percent of the force to separate approximately 1 percent. Separation quotas will be developed by individual rating, pay grade and years of service, and will be published once the board convenes.

    In an effort to provide maximum opportunities for conversion ahead of the board, eligibility requirements will be adjusted to allow eligible Sailors to convert to an undermanned rating prior to the board convening. Those Sailors approved for rating conversion prior to the board will be exempted. Procedures to apply for rating conversion will be published by May 1 and the applications must be received by June 15, 2011.

    Those Sailors not selected for retention will need to separate by June 30, 2012, but qualified Sailors will be afforded the opportunity to compete for a Selected Reserve quota via PTS. The Career Transition Office (CTO) will be available to assist Sailors who desire to make this transition into the Reserve Component.

    Sailors separated by this board will also have access to the Navy's transition assistance programs which includes the Transition Assistance Management Program (TAMP), employment assistance, relocation assistance for separating members stationed overseas, and other benefits for members who are involuntarily separated. Members will also be eligible for involuntary separation pay.

    "Navy values the service of every Sailor. The decision to establish this board was made after careful consideration, and will allow Navy to keep our very best Sailors in these overmanned ratings, improve advancement opportunity, and enable PTS to maintain this balance into the future. We also strove to afford Sailors the opportunity to shift ratings prior to the board and to affiliate with the reserves should they not be continued on active duty."

    To read the ERB announcement, NAVADMIN 129/11, visit www.npc.navy.mil.

    To listen to Chief of Naval Operations, Adm. Gary Roughead's comments on the ERB, visit www.navy.mil/navydata/cnoPlay.asp?id=4379.

    For more news from Chief of Naval Personnel, visit www.navy.mil/local/cnp.

  • Ray Norberto

    So my son Chris told us he's planning on filing an application for the STA-21 program. He's only been in the Navy since he entered RTC on November 16th of last year. I was researching the opportunity, and I found that most accepted sailors have not less than two years and in most cases more than four years. Will he be allowed to file his application - the deadline is July 1st - as such a newbie? And what would be the odds of his getting an acceptance?
  • Paige

    Ray, the link that I attached below is for an article posted on the Navy New Service recently regarding the STA-21 program.  There is information in the article which may help answer some of your questions.  There is also a group here on the NavyDads site called STA-21.  You might check out the group page and read thru some of the posts.

    My son was planning to submit his application this July also, but he was advised by his superiors it was best he wait at least one more year.  His chances of being selected will improve.  He already has quite a few college credits and outstanding evals, but he's only been active duty 3 yrs. come this July.  

    http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=59529

  • Ray Norberto

    That seems about what the research showed me, in terms of your son's advisement from his superiors. The Navy seems to want more experienced sailors who are showing a desire to make a longer term commitment to the branch. Thanks for the link, it was one I had read too, and very good. It shows me that my son is thinking about more than the next generation of CALL OF DUTY game coming out!
  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    Retention Board Quotas Released

    WASHINGTON (NNS) -- Initial enlisted retention board (ERB) quotas were published May 18 to provide Sailors a clearer picture of the competition in individual ratings, paygrades, and years of service-competitive categories.

    "These initial quotas have been released to show Sailors how focused the ERB will be and to help them make informed career decisions," explained Rear Adm. Tony Kurta, director of military personnel plans and policy.

    As a result of increased competition and reduced opportunity for strong-performing Sailors to reenlist caused by record high retention and low attrition, Navy announced the establishment of the ERB in NAVADMIN 129/11, April 14.

    The main objective is to help the Navy achieve mandated end strength by eliminating overmanning in 31 ratings. Rebalancing Navy manpower will have many benefits in the Fleet, including improved Perform-to-Serve reenlistment approval and advancement opportunity in these ratings.

    All 15,688 eligible Sailors will first be reviewed for adverse performance; no quotas have been established for this portion of the ERB. Retention quotas will then be applied to years of service (YOS) bands where overmanning is concentrated. These bands are focused by rating and paygrade, and are established to ensure a balance of seniority, skills, and experience necessary to meet current and future Navy requirements.

    Since chiefs and senior chiefs in the designated 31 ratings are not currently overmanned in the 7-14 YOS bands, they will not compete for retention quotas, but will still be reviewed for adverse performance.

    The quotas posted on the Navy Personnel Command website are first listed by rating and paygrade, with a "rating inventory" showing the total number in each category. This is followed by the total number of Sailors eligible for the ERB within that category. All of these Sailors will receive a performance review.

    For example, when a Sailor looks at the quotas, they will see there are 491 ABF3s and 371 ABF2s in the Navy. Of this group, there are only 2 ABF3's with 7-14 years of service and 180 ABF2's with 7-14 years of service who are eligible for the ERB.

    The second block of numbers is further refined and focuses on the number of eligible Sailors within each YOS band subject to the quota-based review. Not all YOS will be subject to quotas. The final block shows the total number of Sailors who will be retained.

    Returning to the previous example, the quota-based portion of the board will review the ABF3s with 7-14 YOS, and ABF2s with 7-13 YOS (YOS 14 will not be reviewed for ABF2s). These populations are 2 and 176 respectively, equaling a total of 178 Sailors who will compete for the 101 retention quotas.

    These initial quotas are only a snapshot of the current rating manning. Revised quotas will be developed based upon Sailor retention behavior and approved rating conversion requests in the intervening period. These final quotas will be released after the board convenes, following the same process as Enlisted Selection Boards.

    To view learn more about the ERB, conversion opportunities and to view the complete quota list, visit http://www.public.navy.mil/BUPERS-NPC/BOARDS/ENLISTEDCONTINUATION/P....

     

     

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    hugely important news:

     

    Navy Revises Career Paths to Emphasize Service at Sea


    Story Number: NNS110712-05
    Release Date: 7/12/2011 2:41:00 PM


     



    1 1


    WASHINGTON (NNS) -- The Navy released a message announcing revisions to the sea/shore flow for enlisted career paths July 12.

    NAVADMIN 201/11 provides the Fleet with the updated sea shore flow for every rating. Thirty-six ratings will see an increase in sea time, and 18 will now be classified as sea intensive. Sailors in these ratings can expect to spend more than half their careers at sea.

    "Our nation knows the importance and effectiveness of our forward-deployed Navy, whether delivering aid to those in need, or hunting terrorists. The skills and capabilities of our Sailors are in great demand as an integral part of our national security and maritime strategy," explained Rear Adm. Cynthia Covell, director, Total Force requirements Division (OPNAV N12). "As a result, the Navy has increased the number of sea duty billets and decreased the number of shore duty billets since 2008."

    To meet the new sea/shore requirements, Navy Personnel Command may adjust some Sailors' projected rotation dates (PRD) based on the length of tour remaining. As a general rule, PRDs of March 2012 or earlier will not be adjusted, unless requested by the Sailor or if their commanding officer submits a request based on unit readiness or deployment needs.

    To maintain proper career progression, no sea tour lengths will involuntarily exceed 60 months for Sailors with less than 20 years of service (YOS) and 48 months for Sailors with more than 20 YOS. Sailors are advised to contact their community manager or detailer for information on the availability of incentives such as sea duty incentive pay for volunteering to serve additional time at sea.

    To read the complete list of enlisted rating career paths, visit the Navy Personnel Command website at www.npc.navy.mil.

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    FY12 ENLISTED RETENTION BOARD page from Navy Personnel Command

     

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

     

    Transition Benefits: "Shipmates to Workmates" Transitions Talent

    Story Number: NNS111130-09 Date: 11/30/2011

    From Naval Sea Systems Command Public Affairs

    WASHINGTON (NNS) -- Now that the Navy has begun notifying the more than 3,000 Sailors impacted by Enlisted Retention Boards, six major Navy commands have started a program to aid transitioning Sailors compete for job opportunities as federal civilians.

    The Shipmates to Workmates program - managed jointly by the Naval Sea Systems Command, Naval Air Systems Command, Naval Facilities Command, Naval Supply Systems Command, Commander, Naval Installations, Space and Naval Warfare Command, and the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations - will provide information about career opportunities available at partnering commands and actively assist sailors prepare job applications and resumes.

    The participating commands will steer separating sailors, command career counselors and transition assistance coordinators to a dedicated Shipmates to Workmates website to facilitate participation. This website will serve as a "one-stop shop" for sailors seeking to Navy-related employment.

    "Finding out that you are being separated from the Navy, will be a significant blow," said Rear Adm. Clarke Orzalli, vice commander NAVSEA. "The Shipmates to Workmates program is an opportunity to do what we can to soften the blow, as well as continue to utilize their significant skills for the benefit of the Navy."

    Through the website and other outreach programs, the effort will attempt to demystify the government service hiring process, match job supply to demand, link existing Navy and Defense Department transition support, and assist qualified sailors with local hiring processes.

    "The Shipmates to Workmates program is simply good leadership - this program demonstrates our commitment, as leaders, to our sailors by assisting those being involuntarily separated," said Cmdr. Pat Sanders, NAVSEA's lead for the program.

    Each of the participating commands will participate in job fairs and other hiring events for transitioning sailors. The first event is a career forum that will be held Dec. 3 from 1100 to 1400 at NSA Bethesda in the Fleet and Family Support Center, Bldg. 11, room 109. Future forums are scheduled at fleet concentration areas throughout the country, including a Dec. 6 forum in Norfolk.

    For more information on the "Shipmates to Workmates" program as well as a full schedule of upcoming career forums, please visit the Shipmates to Workmates website at http://jobs.navair.navy.mil/sm2wm/.

     

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    Enlisted Retention Board Process Explained

    The following is a message from Chief of Naval Personnel and Navy Total Force Command Fleet Master Chief  Scott Benning on the enlisted retention board process.

    Over the past few years, we have had to make some difficult, but necessary choices to balance our force.  Our Navy has felt the effects of record-high retention in several ratings, under manning in other key ratings, force structure changes and decisions required to meet changing platforms and manning requirements.  To meet our global mission by filling billets at sea and manning the Fleet with the right mix of Sailors, we needed to use a combination of force-shaping methods.

     

    It is important to recognize upfront that the ERB was conducted using the same principles as all of our boards – these principles are fairness, equity and integrity.  Our board process is a fair, structured and a tried-and-true process.  The board members strictly followed a board precept, which outlined how the board was executed.   The board was conducted in two phases, and the precept gave board members specific guidance on selection standards for each phase.  First was a performance review, where each member’s record was strictly examined following the precept.  Following that was the quota-based portion of the board, which racked-and-stacked each Sailor’s record next to their peers to select the best-qualified Sailors for retention.  Board members included a diverse group of officers, warrant officers, command master chiefs and master chiefs, representing different ratings, geographic locations and warfare perspectives, who relied on their best judgment and Fleet perspective throughout the process.

    Most importantly, all members of the board took an oath pledging that they would perform their board duties without prejudice or partiality.  Under the oath, members also gave their word not to speak to anyone outside of the board about individual records, board discussions, or individual votes.  These measures ensure that members can be fully engaged in making the best decisions as a board, and maintains confidentiality and the integrity of the board process.

    We recognize this also means that Sailors are not able to get more details on why they were separated, and for some that may be troubling.  While we understand that not having these details leaves many questions unanswered, and provides little closure, I want you to know that as a past member of several boards, I can personally attest that the Navy’s boards are conducted with the absolute highest levels of fairness, equity and integrity.

    To our senior enlisted leaders – you have the very important task of making sure your Sailors stay smart on the many policies that will impact their careers.  Your Sailors are looking to you for guidance on how to be best prepared for milestones such as Perform to Serve, advancement exams, and selection boards.   Please do not take this responsibility lightly.

    It’s also important that you take the lead in ensuring Sailors separating due to the ERB are aware of the many transition programs the Navy has in place to assist them, and their family members.  We’ve put in place several enhanced transition benefits for those Sailors.  Perhaps the most valuable is the outplacement service provided by the firm of Challenger, Gray and Christmas, Inc., or CGC. Right now, Sailors enrolled with CGC are receiving one-on-one resume and interview preparation, customized job search and placement assistance to help them obtain civilian employment.  This program provides crucial benefits to our Sailors, and we strongly encourage all ERB-separating Sailors to take advantage of this service that has been contracted to enable greater opportunities for success as you transition.

    Shipmates, just as you have been here for the Navy, your Navy leadership is here for you and we want to do all we can to assist you in a successful transition.

    Thank you to all of our Sailors and their families who work extremely hard and sacrifice everyday to enable the success of our Navy and nation.  We are truly grateful for your service

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    this is what a Profile Sheet looks like by the way...your sailors future is dependent on these profiles and the scores they achieve on advancement exams, evals, and billets available.

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    from Navy Times:

    More cuts looming

    DoD to plan for fewer troops, frozen PCS moves, slashed bonuses

    By Andrew Tilghman

    atilghman@militarytimes.com

    The massive defense cuts threat­ening the military next year would have an immediate impact on the active-duty force: halting travel, reducing incentive pays, abruptly slashing funding for Afghanistan operations and most likely leading to involuntary separations, according to experts.

    Top Pentagon officials say they will begin formal planning this summer for the so-called seques­tration budget cuts that will take effect in January if Congress fails to reach an overarching deal to reduce federal spending. Many experts say it appears increasing­ly likely that the military will actually face the spending cuts that were considered highly improbable just a few months ago. “I expect sequestration in some form to take effect,” said Macken­zie Eaglen, a defense analyst with the American Enterprise Insti­tute. “I think the outcome is going to be pretty ugly, no matter what happens.” The cuts would reduce the Pen­tagon’s base budget to 2007 levels, adjusted for inflation.

    Some pillars of military life will remain unchanged. Twice-month­ly paychecks, housing and food allowances and combat pay are set by law.

    But many perks that pad pay­checks likely would end immedi­ately, such as re-enlistment bonus­es and the array of incentive pays provided to troops with special language skills or in specialty career fields such as aviation, sub­marines, surface ships and medicine, said Fred Pang, a former top Pentagon manpower official under President Clinton.

    Re-enlistment standards likely would tighten as the services tried to shrink the force through attri­tion. The flow of new recruits would likely slow, and the Delayed Entry Program would expand as the services decided how to man­age their new budgets, Pang said.

    Moreover, troops likely would face a halt to virtually all travel and moving assignments.

    “All of a sudden, everybody is frozen in place,” Pang said. “For all intents and purposes, you’d stop all permanent change-of­station travel, all temporary duty travel, everything except for the medical kind or moving back from the combat zone.” Sequestration would affect the money that supports troops in Afghanistan and other overseas contingency operations, a Penta­gon spokeswoman said. But it remains unclear precisely what that impact would be.

    President Obama has the authority to protect military per­sonnel accounts from the direct effects of sequestration. But that will not fully blunt the impact on service members.

    “Even if you exempt personnel accounts, you are still going to have a big problem,” said Larry Korb, a former Pentagon manpow­er official under President Reagan who is now a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress in Washington, D.C.

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    hear that......Eric in Hawaii...no PCS x'fers makes me wonder how he's getting back to the mainland.......

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    why support the military when you can p!$$ away $500 mil on Solyndra and the like.....

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

    sorry all....haven't been posting much though there is so much to keep up on.  The handwriting may be on the wall for the future of our sailors and our fleet. 

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    CNP Talks Tuition Assistance, PTS and More with Sailors in Norfolk...

    Story Number: NNS130319-06 Release Date: 3/19/2013 1:32:00 PM

    By Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Darien G. Kenney, Navy Public Affairs Support Element - East

    NORFOLK (NNS) -- Chief of Naval Personnel addressed Sailors during an all-hands call aboard Naval Station Norfolk, March 18.

    Vice Adm. Scott Van Buskirk took this opportunity to discuss issues affecting Sailors' naval careers, their families and their futures. One of the big-ticket items in the news lately is tuition assistance.

    "Ninety percent of Sailors who use TA complete the courses they take and Navy leadership is actively working to keep TA in this tough economy," said Van Buskirk. "They are looking at the structure to allow those Sailors who are eligible to continue to use it."

    He also discussed the continued impact Sailors have throughout the fleet from an operational standpoint.

    "The missions you are accomplishing are making a difference in the world because you are all tremendous ambassadors," said Van Buskirk. "We have supported deployments on the ground and on ships and are fully engaged in supporting critical missions from the Horn of Africa to Afghanistan to the Western Pacific."

    Van Buskirk said his number one priority is to man the fleet by ensuring Sailors are assignable, deployable and distributable.

    "In the last year, we have had 90 percent PTS approval and greater than 95 percent in the last four months," said Van Buskirk.

    Van Buskirk said the Navy is continuing to make improvements to PTS, which increases Sailors' ability to have a say in their career and improve the ability to distribute Sailors where we need them most.

    During a question and answer session, Van Buskirk took questions regarding the Navy's current financial state since enacting sequestration and what the future holds.

    "It feels good to know that the Navy leadership hears our concerns and for the CNP to come and let us know that he is on our side and doing everything for Sailors," said Boatswain's Mate 2nd Class (SW/AW) Darius Branch.

    When asked about retirement pay, Van Buskirk said a commission will be stood up to look at retirement pay, but current active duty will be grandfathered into the current retirement pay.

    Much of the question and answer session focused on family-related programs, and Van Buskirk assured attendees the Navy is dedicated to helping Sailors and their families.

    "Our Navy remains committed to maintaining the funding for our Sailors and family readiness programs as much as possible, and our goal is to have no impact on those programs in the future," said Van Buskirk.

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    September Exams Pave Way for Continued Advancement...

    Story Number: NNS130430-05
    Release Date: 4/30/2013 1:51:00 PM

    By Ensign Jacqui Wengler, Naval Education and Training Command Public Affairs

    PENSACOLA, Fla. (NNS) -- The Navy announced guidance for the administration of the Cycle 220 September 2013 E4-E6 Advancement Exam via Naval Administrative Message (NAVADMIN) 116/13, released April 29.

    The message outlines procedures and general examination information. Eligibility criteria, deadlines for commands to confirm eligibility lists, waiver application procedures and special requirements are also contained in the NAVADMIN.

    NAVADMIN 116/13 covers Active Duty, Active Reserve, Full Time Support, and Canvasser Recruiter Sailors testing for advancement in rate.

    Because of the Personnel Security Investigation (PSI) budget shortfall due to FY13 Continuing Resolution (CR) and sequestration, this cycle of exams will be different regarding security clearances. The NAVADMIN states that due to these budget shortfalls, Sailors with an expired or expiring security clearance are still considered to be in access and may participate in the exam cycle.

    Commands pending deployment and deployed ships and Sailors who are unable to take the exams during the scheduled dates may order exams six months early. Educational Services Officers (ESOs) must follow procedures outlined in the message regarding missed examination cycles prior to Cycle 220.

    For the first time in 13 years the examination answer sheet form has been updated. The new answer sheets reflect the newly-structured 175 question examination format and replaces the Social Security Number (SSN) with the Department of Defense Identification Number (DOD-ID). This new answer sheet will be green in color distinguishing it from the old red answer sheets. So far, nearly 500 new answer sheets have been sent to commands requesting early orders for Cycle 220.

    Master Chief Cryptologic Technician Eddy Mejias, Naval Education and Training Professional Development Technology Center (NETPDTC) command master chief, says it is important for Sailors to take their careers into their own hands and ensure they use the resources produced by the Navy Advancement Center.

    "The bibliographies published on Navy Advancement Center's Navy Knowledge Online (NKO) page provide each advancement candidate with the primary tools they will need to successfully master the content on cycle-specific exams," said Mejias. "We publish bibliographies directly from the questions used on an exam, so Sailors should have confidence in their exam preparation when they study all the material listed in their rating bibliography."

    Examination results will be posted on the Navy Enlisted Advancement Systems (NEAS) website and may be accessed by ESOs and authorized viewers.

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    Quotas are out for Cycle 219 March 2013 Petty Officer (E4-E6) http://www.navy.mil/docs/active_pao_cycle_219.pdf

  • NavyDads Admin (Paul)

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    Cycle 219 March 2013 Petty Officer (E4-E6) Advancement Results – FY14:

    Results Are Released!

    About 3,700 fewer active-duty petty officers will advance this cycle, with advancement opportunity falling across all three paygrades.

    Active-duty sailors were selected to fill 22,681 quotas this cycle, compared with 26,379 from November. E-5s saw the sharpest drop in opportunity — 26.51 percent this cycle, down from 32.42 percent last cycle. E-6s (17.46 percent, down from 19.59 percent) and E-6s (43.77 percent, down from 47.7 percent) also saw decreases.

    Full-time support sailors and canvasser recruiters will fill 573 quotas, up from 476 last year.

    I'm so proud of my son and super happy!
    BZ to all of the sailors who've advanced HOOYAH! :)

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    Special Programs: Think Equal Opportunity Advisor...

    Story Number: NNS130522-19 Release Date: 5/22/2013 12:45:00 PM
    By By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Andrea Perez, Navy Personnel Command Public Affairs Office

    MILLINGTON, Tenn. (NNS) -- Sailors looking to enhance their career by working outside their rate should consider becoming an Equal Opportunity Advisor (EOA), Navy leaders said May 22.

    "Equal opportunity advisors play a vital role in the Navy's ability to maintain operational readiness and accomplish its mission," said Senior Chief Sonar Technician (Surface) Mark Vandervort, EOA detailer, Navy Personnel Command (NPC).

    According to MILPERSMAN 1306-917, EOAs can stimulate a free-flow of communication at all levels within a chain of command, making them an invaluable asset to the Navy.

    Vandervort says EOAs are command climate experts who strengthen a chain of command by keeping leadership aware of any equal opportunity related issues as well as procedures and practices that may affect the mission, readiness, welfare and morale of Sailors.

    "Those commands that can capitalize on their Sailor's skill sets are those that perform the best," said Vandervort. "As the command climate expert, it is the EOA's responsibility to assess the command climate and determine not only what is working right within a command, but also identify potential barriers that may prohibit Sailors from achieving their full potential."

    Sailors in pay grades E-6 to E-9 may be eligible to apply for EOA duty after being interviewed by an EOA.

    To become an EOA, Sailors must earn the 9515 Equal Opportunity Advisor Navy Enlisted Classification (NEC) by attending the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute (DEOMI) at Patrick Air Force Base in Cocoa Beach, Fla.

    "The EOA course is intense but rewarding," said Vandervort. "The training not only provides students with the tools required to be an EOA, but also provides them with a variety of tools that will allow them to grow as leaders."

    The 12-week EOA course provides training in gender communications and cultural awareness, socialization, conflict management, complaints processing, interpersonal communications, and many other topics.

    "EOAs ensure Sailors are being treated fairly and with the dignity and respect with which all Sailors should expect to be treated. When utilized correctly, the EOA can be an integral member of the command's leadership team," said Vandervort.

    EOAs are assigned to major shore commands, nuclear aircraft carriers, amphibious assault ships and training commands.

    A complete listing of eligibility requirements can be found in MILPERSMAN 1306-917. Sailors who meet the requirements and would like to apply for EOA duty should request release to Special Programs by submitting a completed NAVPERS 1306/7 to their rating detailer prior to entering their normal detailing window.

    The required obligated service for an EOA tour is 36 months, and members selected are required to complete two full consecutive EOA tours, one sea and one shore.

    Special Program detailers assign Sailors to more than 20 special programs Navy-wide, including Recruit Division Commander duty and recruiting duty, service on the USS Constitution or the USS Arizona Memorial, and assignment to the Blue Angels or the Navy Ceremonial Guard. MILPERSMAN 1306-900 contains a complete list of special programs available.

    For more information, visit the EOA Web Page on the NPC website at www.npc.navy.mil/ENLISTED/DETAILING/SHORESPECIALPROGRAMS/Pages/EOAS...

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    Cycle 092 (Feb 2013) "Reserve" E4-E6 Advancement Results:
    http://www.slideshare.net/NETPDTC/092-e4-e6

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    NAVY EXAMS ARE NOT PASS/FAIL, BUT IT IS POSSIBLE TO FAIL...

    Navy-wide Advancement Exams (NWAE) are designed to create a distribution of scores so candidates can be rank-ordered. The purpose of the exam is not to pass or garner a certain score to show a level of knowledge, the exam is designed so the Navy can determine where a Sailor stands in comparison to his/her peers taking the same test, in the same paygrade and rating. In other words, the test determines how much you know about your rating's occupational standards compared to your peers. The raw score (total number of questions answered correctly) is used to calculate the standard score (20-80), which is a numeric representation of your standing among all other test takers. An 80 indicates the candidate(s) with the highest raw score. However, to pass the advancement exam, you will need to have a raw score of at least 49 for E4, 55 for E5 and 61 for E6 and E7. Currently, all enlisted advancement exams have 175 questions.
    (N32)

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    Application Period Open for CNO's Rapid Innovation Cell...

    Story Number: NNS130625-12Release Date: 6/25/2013 3:08:00 PM
    From Navy Warfare Development Command Public Affairs

    NORFOLK (NNS) -- The Navy is currently accepting applications for new members of the CNO's Rapid Innovation Cell (CRIC) for fiscal year 2014.

    The CRIC was established in 2012 to provide junior leaders with an opportunity to identify and rapidly field emerging technologies that address the Navy's most pressing challenges. The CRIC capitalizes on the unique perspective and familiarity that junior leaders possess regarding modern warfare, revolutionary ideas, and disruptive technologies.

    Navy Warfare Development Command (NWDC) manages the program and provides administrative and travel support.

    CRIC members are volunteers from a cross-section of Navy communities. Participation in the CRIC is a collateral duty that does not require a geographic relocation or release from one's present duty assignments. Selection to the CRIC is based partly on a candidate's proposed project. Once a CRIC member's project is approved, the member remains in the CRIC to shepherd his or her project to completion.

    CRIC candidates must have exceptional drive, passion and vision necessary to carry a project to completion. The burden of membership is high, but the rewards are even greater. CRIC members regularly meet with leading innovators in the government and civilian sector, and have access to flag-level sponsorship, funding and a support staff dedicated to turning a member's vision into reality.

    Ideal CRIC candidates are officers O-3 and below, and enlisted members E-4 to E-6 transitioning to or currently on shore duty. Having an identified problem to solve with a rapidly implementable solution is desired, but not required. CRIC members generally commit about four days per month outside of their regular duties, participating in ideation events and managing their project. Because CRIC membership is project-based, length of membership depends on the duration of the individual's project, but should not exceed 24 months.

    Current projects include 3-D printing, Google Glass integration (Sea Glass), crowdsourced wargaming, and new communication capabilities.

    "We are looking for innovation minded personnel with a demonstrated ability to think and operate outside normal paradigms," said Rear Adm. Terry B. Kraft, commander, NWDC. "The CRIC was established to give our junior 'disruptive thinkers' a safe haven to mature nontraditional solutions until they can effectively demonstrate their value to the fleet."

    The application period is open to July 31, 2013. Nominations forms and further information are available at https://www.nwdc.navy.mil/ncfi/cric/default.aspx.

    Candidates will be announced no later than September 1, 2013. Membership start dates will be staggered throughout the fiscal year; as current members rotate back to sea duty or complete their projects, new members will be added. Verified command support is required for membership.

    For more news from Navy Warfare Development Command, visit www.navy.mil/local/nwdc/.

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary


    SEPTEMBER ACTIVE DUTY ADVANCEMENT EXAMS

    The Active Duty E4-E6 Navy-wide advancement exams scheduled for September will be held on the following dates:
    E6 - 5 SEPTEMBER 2013
    E5 - 12 SEPTEMBER 2013
    E4 - 19 SEPTEMBER 2013
    For more information on this advancement cycle, check NAVADMIN 116/13.
    (N32)

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    Active Duty CPO QUOTAS:
    Cycle 218 FTS E7 Quotas are posted on NPC's website.
    (N32)


    RESERVE CPO QUOTAS:
    Cycle 218 FTS E7 Quotas are posted on NPC's website.
    (N32)

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    Nimitz Conducts Career Fair at Sea...

    Story Number: NNS130723-07Release Date: 7/23/2013 9:29:00 AM
    By Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Derek A. Harkins, USS Nimitz Public Affairs

    USS NIMITZ, At Sea (NNS) -- Sailors aboard the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN 68) conducted a career fair on the ship's aft mess decks July 21.

    "One of the Navy career counselors jobs is to provide information to the crew," said Chief Navy Counselor Dean Miller, a career counselor aboard Nimitz. "One of the most successful ways to accomplish that task is to hold a career fair. We floated the idea up the chain of command, who were receptive and supportive of this combined event, and were given the green light."

    Volunteers for the event taught Sailors about opportunities to advance their careers through commissioning programs, educational opportunities and special assignments that include recruiting and instructor duties.

    "If Sailors are interested in molding the future of the Navy as an instructor, I want to encourage them to do that," said Chief Electronics Technician Timothy Hoover, an administrative leading chief petty officer for the "Blue Diamonds" of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 146 currently embarked with Nimitz.

    Another opportunity Sailors had the chance to learn about was serving at Recruit Training Command (RTC), helping to mold newly recruited Sailors at the Navy's only enlisted boot camp.

    "Depending on a Sailor's paygrade, serving as a recruit division commander (RDC) can help advance their career a lot," said Chief Yeoman Joel Campbell, a former RDC at RTC.
    Sailors seeking to serve in special operations forces or in the explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) field were guided on paths they would need to take to be eligible for those duties.

    "I really enjoy talking to the EOD guys," said Gunner's Mate 3rd Class Joseph Janelle, a Sailor who visited the career fair. "I've been trying for EOD. They're helping me out with that."

    The event was conducted on a Sunday, with many of Nimitz' Sailors off duty for holiday routine. This allowed for many Sailors to take their time and visit multiple stations at the fair.

    "There are two things that are a prime commodity for an aircraft carrier: time and space" said Miller. "We were able to nail down a space and a time that would maximize the use of talent on board and reach the majority of the crew. This was truly a combined effort."

    Sailors from a variety of different ratings and paygrades advised the participants. These volunteers offered the participants pamphlets, instruction and advice.

    "This is a nice forum for young Sailors wanting to do something beyond what they're doing here on the ship," said Hoover. "It helps them decide what they want for their future in the Navy."

    With participation from Sailors with experience from many different opportunities and assignments, Nimitz' career fair provided the crew with information on how to make the most of their futures.

    "We're allowing Sailors to benefit from the experience of people who have done certain jobs," said Hoover. "Holding career fairs like this in the Navy is important."

    "Sometimes we tend to forget about taking time out of our schedule to talk about our careers because we are so focused on the mission," said Miller. "This career fair offered an opportunity to have subject matter experts provide answers to the crew. We wanted to highlight the incredible jobs the Navy has to offer when it is your time to roll to shore duty."

    Nimitz Carrier Strike Group is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet Area of Responsibility conducting maritime security operations, theater security cooperation efforts and support missions for Operation Enduring Freedom.

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    EXAM BIBLIOGRAPHY DETAIL

    There have been a few questions on our forum about the lack of detail (chapter/page information) in some rating bibliographies, so this note will address that topic.

    The Navy administers norm-referenced exams, which are designed to compare the rating knowledge of Sailors in the same rating and paygrade so a rank-ordered list can be created. However, most tests taken outside of the Navy are criterion exams (pass/fail), where a standard has to be met f...or qualification or a letter grade.

    Due to the nature of Navy enlisted exams, detailed bibliographies would defeat the purpose of the exam which is to determine who are the most knowledgeable Sailors - NOT who are the best studiers.

    Rating subject matter experts (SMEs) work with the NAC staff to develop exam bibliographies based on the questions loaded on an exam. The reference detail that lists pages, chapters, enclosures, etc., is determined by SMEs at an Advancement Exam Readiness Review (AERR).

    There are many factors that are taken into consideration by SMEs when developing reference detail, but it's important to understand the purpose of the exam when you see your bibliography.

    First, you have the same bibliography as everyone else in the same paygrade and rating. Some say it's equally unfair...

    Bottom line: Sailors with the most rating knowledge, who truly know more about their rating than their peers, are best served by a bibliography that has the least amount of reference detail.

    (N32)

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    FY-14 ACTIVE-DUTY NAVY E7 SELECTION BOARD RESULTS
    Congratulations to all CPO selectees!
    (N32)

    http://www.navy.mil/ah_online/documents/fy14_e7results.pdf

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    Navy Advancement Center Announces Enlisted Examination Answer Sheet Change...

    Story Number: NNS130806-01Release Date: 8/6/2013 12:07:00 AM
    By Tom Updike, Naval Education Training Professional Development Technology Center

    PENSACOLA, Fla. (NNS) -- The updated enlisted examination answer sheet announced Aug. 5 in naval administrative message (NAVADMIN) 195-13 will be implemented for the E4-E6 Navy-wide advancement exams, administered starting in Aug. 2013 for Reserve and Active Duty personnel.

    The new form, NETPDTC 1430/2 (REV 3-2013), is green in color and replaces the red answer sheet which has been in use for more than 10 years. A key change to the new form is the use of the Department of Defense Identification Number (DOD ID). The DOD ID is a unique 10-digit number that is associated with personnel and their common access card (CAC). A DOD ID is assigned to each person registered in the Defense Enrollment and Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS).

    "The new green exam answer sheet is part of a larger effort within NEAS (Navy Enlisted Advancement System) to support the Department of Defense's social security number reduction plan," said Cdr. Scott Briquelet, Navy Advancement Center (NAC) director. "We are taking steps to inform all command ESOs (Educational Services Officers) of the answer sheet change in advance of the upcoming exam cycles."

    The NAC ships and processes more than 300,000 examination answer sheets each year. The use of the DOD ID rather than an individual Sailor's social security number (SSN) mitigates exposure of advancement candidates' personally identifiable information (PII).

    CACs issued after June 2011 will have the DOD ID number displayed on the back of the card. Sailors with access to an NMCI computer can also get their DOD ID number by looking for the window containing the 10-digit DOD ID number during log in or upon removal of the CAC.

    The new green answer sheet must be used for all future examination cycles. Command ESOs should destroy any outdated red answer sheets held. Use of a red answer sheet will result in scanning errors and exam discrepancies.

    NAC also updated the Advancement in Rate or Change of Rating Worksheet (NETPDTC 1430/3 REV 06-13) which is used locally by commands to perform calculations and establish eligibility for enlisted advancement cycles. Advancement information on the form, such as a Sailor's performance mark average (PMA) and individual award points is copied from the cycle worksheet to the examination answer sheet on the day of the exam. The new worksheet also requires the use of the DOD ID. The form can be downloaded on the Navy Enlisted Advancement System (NEAS) Web at https://neasos.cnet.navy.mil/.

    "We are also using NEAS Web to help ESOs look up individual advancement candidate DOD IDs to support exam ordering and processing," added Briquelet.

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    New, Flexible Career Options Provide Opportunities for a Lifetime of Service...

    Story Number: NNS130807-06Release Date: 8/7/2013 12:59:00 PM
    By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Andrea Perez

    MILLINGTON, Tenn. (NNS) -- Continuum of Service (CoS) programs provide Sailors more flexibility to move between the active and Reserve components, allowing for a lifetime of service, officials said in a message released Aug. 7.

    NAVADMIN 198/13 applies to eligible officer and enlisted Sailors who currently serve on active duty or in the Reserves.

    The message provides an overview of various CoS programs which allow Sailors to transition between the components. The message also details rating and designator conversion programs for enlisted and officer personnel, and the Career Intermission Pilot Program, which allows Sailors to temporarily transition to the Individual Ready Reserve.

    Applications for CoS programs can be submitted by detailers, command career counselors or anyone with prior access to Fleet-RIDE through the new Career Waypoints (C-WAY) information technology system. A NAVPERS 5239/8 (SAAR Addendum) is required to access C-WAY.

    The C-WAY system is a part the Career Navigator Program and combines all Navy career management processes together to provide Sailors with tools that are more transparent and integrated, and give them a more active role in managing their careers.

    Sailors considering any rating conversion may improve their opportunity for selection by taking the Armed Forces Classification Test to improve their initial ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) score. This may expand the number of ratings for which they qualify.

    Active-duty Sailors not granted an in-rate or conversion opportunity can always request to join the Navy Reserve five-to-three months prior to their end of active obligated service. The Navy Reserve also offers a two-year deployment deferment for Sailors who join within six months of leaving active duty.

    The Career Transition Office (CTO) at Navy Personnel Command (NPC) provides counseling and support to active-duty officer and enlisted Sailors considering a transition to the Reserves. Interested Sailors can contact a CTO representative by phone at (901) 874-4192, or email at cto.officer@navy.mil or cto.enlisted@navy.mil.

    For more detailed information on CoS programs and the Career Navigator Program, visit the C-WAY Web Page on the NPC website at www.npc.navy.mil/career/careercounseling/Pages/CareerWaypointSystem....

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    Continue to Serve Through Conversion...

    Story Number: NNS130821-10Release Date: 8/21/2013 1:13:00 PM
    By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Andrea Perez, Navy Personnel Command Public Affairs

    MILLINGTON, Tenn. (NNS) -- Conversion programs allow Sailors from all walks of life to make a major job change and continue their Navy careers, officials said Aug. 21.

    Several Continuum of Service (CoS) conversion programs that apply to eligible officer and enlisted Sailors who are currently serving on active duty or in the Reserves are outlined in NAVADMIN 198/13.

    To date, thousands of Sailors have converted to different ratings, allowing the Navy to keep Sailors who are committed to a career in the Navy.

    According to a new conversion status report on the Active Duty Conversions Web Page on www.npc.navy.mil, more than half of active duty conversion requests in 2013 have already been approved.

    Applications for conversion can be submitted by detailers, command career counselors (CCCs) or anyone with prior access to Fleet-RIDE through the new Career Waypoint (C-WAY) information technology system. A NAVPERS 5239/8 (SAAR Addendum) is required to access C-WAY.

    Active-duty enlisted Sailors, in conjunction with reenlistment applications submitted via the C-WAY-Reenlistment process, can voluntarily request to change ratings.

    Reserve Sailors, working with their CCC, can view and apply for a rating conversion through C-WAY-Conversion.

    Active-duty and Reserve officers interested in conversion can request a voluntary designator change. Requests for Reserve designator changes are considered continuously, while requests for AC designator changes are decided by a lateral transfer board twice a year.

    Per MILPERSMAN 1440-010, requests for conversion into ratings that are properly manned, will only be considered on a case-by-case basis and requests for conversion to overmanned ratings will not be considered.

    For more information, visit www.npc.navy.mil/CAREER/CAREERCOUNSELING/Pages/Conversions.aspx or www.npc.navy.mil/career/careercounseling/Pages/CareerWaypointSystem...;

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    NAVY-WIDE ADVANCEMENT EXAM VERBATIM
    The first few minutes of the administration of a Navy-wide Advancement Exam (NWAE) is a nervous time when advancement candidates are wondering what will be inside that sealed exam booklet. What did the exam proctor just say? Well, check out the link below to get an early look at what will be read aloud before you open your upcoming exam.
    (N32)

    Verbatim Aug 2013

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    Taking a Break
    How three Sailors used CIPP to accomplish their life goals...

  • NavyDads Co-Admin, Gary

    WHAT HAPPENS TO MY EXAM AFTER I TURN IT IN?

    Command ESOs are responsible for immediately gathering and shipping answer sheets. Shipments are mailed to NAC in Pensacola, Fla. Once received, the NAC staff inventories each box, verifies command information, and prepares the batch for scanning and imaging. As each answer sheet is processed, discrepancies are worked to ensure each candidate's record is accurate so all elements of the Final Multiple Score are set for the rank-order process. All candidate answer sheets are archived digitally.
    (N32)


    Why haven't the results come out yet?

    After an advancement exam is administered, Sailors wait patiently for the results. We've noticed on this forum that many continue to ask when the E4/E5/E6 results will be released. That information is not available to the NAC, but rather depends on a process that includes Fleet ESOs and Navy manpower commands. There are seven primary steps that lead to exam results.

    Here is a basic snapshot of the process from exam administration to release of results:

    1. Exams are administered

    2. Fleet and shore ESOs mail answer sheets to Pensacola - historically, this process step takes six to seven weeks because substitute exams must also be counted and returned

    3. Before exams can be scored, 95% of the projected exam answer sheets have to be received from the Fleet to ensure that the Navy doesn't over promote (this includes late exams)

    4. The NAC then sends a listing of how many test passers are in each rating to the CNO

    5. Enlisted Community Managers (ECMs) and manpower authorities determine vacancies and funding available

    6. Quotas are approved by CNP and forwarded to the NAC

    7. Final Multiple Score (FMS) cut lines are set and published results are immediately sent to the Fleet